THE DOT - if this turns orange or red be alert

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Secret Society was put to work - the conspiracy is not a theory

Interestingly a man who was financed by Rothschilds - Cecil Rhodes, who became one of the wealthiest man himself with DeBeers had the idea that Britain should rule the world and founded a secret society for that. The point is rather that Rothschilds who helped to make him rich became the trustee's of his incredible wealth and directed the funds as Rhodes intended but for a different purpose. This plays perfectly into the scenario I described yesterday about Baruch and his friends in America - who did not enter WWI to fight the Germans but rather to have their allies defeat the ottomans in order to take over Palestine. Eventually the effect was disastrous for todays Turkey as its lost all the area which carries most of the crude oil as Iraq, Saudi Arabia belonged to the Ottomans. Most importantly Palestine was given to Britain and they had agreed to pass it over to the Jews for the foundation of Israel. Another important goal was for the Rothschilds who founded BP was to keep control of their oil fields in Persia.

excerpt 1

The British feared that the Ottomans might attack and capture the Middle East (and later Caspian) oil fields.[6] Opposed to the Ottomans, the British Royal Navy depended upon oil from the petroleum deposits in southern Persia, to which the British-controlled Anglo-Persian Oil Company had exclusive access.[6] excerpt 2 refers to rhodes conspiracy

excerpt 2 (Rhodes idea and actions for the secret society)

In the present day I became a member of the Masonic order I see the wealth and power they possess the influence they hold and I think over their ceremonies and I wonder that a large body of men can devote themselves to what at times appear the most ridiculous and absurd rites without an object and without an end.

The idea gleaming and dancing before one's eyes like a will-of-the wisp at last frames itself into a plan. Why should we not form a secret society with but one object the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilised world under British rule for the recovery of the United States for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire. What a dream, but yet it is probable, it is possible. I once heard it argued by a fellow in my own college, I am sorry to own it by an Englishman, that it was a good thing for us that we have lost the United States. There are some subjects on which there can be no arguments, and to an Englishman this is one of them, but even from an American's point of view just picture what they have lost, look at their government, are not the frauds that yearly come before the public view a disgrace to any country and especially their's which is the finest in the world. Would they have occurred had they remained under English rule great as they have become how infinitely greater they would have been with the softening and elevating influences of English rule, think of those countless 000's of Englishmen that during the last 100 years would have crossed the Atlantic and settled and populated the United States. Would they have not made without any prejudice a finer country of it than the low class Irish and German emigrants? All this we have lost and that country loses owing to whom? Owing to two or three ignorant pig-headed statesmen of the last century, at their door lies the blame. Do you

{p. 250} ever feel mad? do you ever feel murderous. I think I do with those men. I bring facts to prove my assertions. Does an English father when his sons wish to emigrate ever think of suggesting emigration under another flag, never - it would seem a disgrace to suggest such a thing I think that we all think that poverty is better under our own flag rather than wealth under a foreign one.

Put your mind into another train of thought. Fancy Australia discovered and colonised under the French flag, what would it mean merely several millions of English unborn that at present exist {Hitler was not more racist} we learn from the past and to form our future. We learn through having lost to cling to wehat we possess. We know the size of the world we know the total extent. Africa is still lying ready for us it is our duty to take it. It is our duty to seize every oportunity of acquiring more territory and we should keep this one idea steadily before our eyes that more territory simply means more of the Anglo-Saxon race more of the best the most human, most honourable race the world possesses {i.e. genocide of other peoples}.

To forward such a scheme what a splendid help a secret society would be a society not openly acknowledged but who would work in secret for such an object.

I contend that there are at the present moment numbers of the ablest men in the world who would devote their whole lives to it. I often think what a loss to the English nation in some respects the abolition of the Rotten Borough System has been. What thought strikes a man entering the house of commons, the assembly that rules the whole world? I think it is the mediocrity of the men but what is the cause. It is simply - an assembly of wealth of men whose lives have been spent in the accumulation of money and whose time has been too much engaged to be able to spare any for the study of past history. And yet in the hands of such men rest our destinies. Do men like the great Pitt, and Bourke and Sheridan not now exist. I contend they do. There are men now living with I know no other term the {greek script} mega chschegis {end greek script; the second word is surely incorrecttly written by Rhodes} of Aristotle but there are not ways for enabling them to serve their Country. They live and die unused unemployed. What has been the main cause of the success of the Romish Church? The fact that every enthusiast, call it if you like every madman finds employment in it. Let us form the same kind of society a Church for the extension of the British Empire. A society which should have its members in every part of the British Empire working with one object and one idea we should have its members placed at our universities and our schools and should watch the English youth passing through their hands just one

{p. 251} perhaps in every thousand would have the mind and feelings for such an object, he should be tried in every way, he should be tested whether he is endurant, possessed of eloquence, disregardful of the petty details of life, and if found to be such, then elected and bound by oath to serve for the rest of his life in his Country. He should then be supported if without means by the Society and sent to that part of the Empire where it was felt he was needed.

..... 2) This is the origin of the Round Table and the Council On Foreign Relations

Rhodes' secret society is called the Round Table; its American branch, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), was set up just after World War I, as the headquarters moved, in effect, across the Atlantic, a move anticipated decades earlier.

In his book on Rhodes' secret society, The Anglo-American Establishment, Carroll Quigley wrote, "in February 1891, Stead and Rhodes ... agreed that, if necessary in order to achieve Anglo-American unity, Britain should join the United States" (p. 38): quigley.html.

The CFR set up the Trilateral Commission to co-ordinate North America, Western Europe and Japan.

The British Empire is now called the British Commonwealth, a name-change pioneered by Round Table leader Lionel Curtis. Carroll Quigley wrote of Curtis, 'In 1911 Curtis decided that the name of His Majesty's Dominions must be changed from "British Empire" to "Commonwealth of Nations." This was done officially in 1948.' (The Anglo-American Establishment, p. 63): quigley.html.

The KBE and DBE awards are still issued (Knight and Dame of the British Empire), although Americans can only constitutionally accept them on an honorary basis. George Bush Snr has an honorary KBE; Elizabeth Taylor an honorary DBE.

The Empire is no longer white-racist, but has become multi-cultural (Hellenistic). It has invited leaders from other peoples to join it in world-rulership. Open Society, Open Conspiracy: opensoc.html

It won the Cold War, yet its own civilization seems close to collapse, on account of the New Left (Trotskyist) takeover of its cultural institutions.

(3) The Zionist connection

From Sarah Gertrude Millin, Rhodes, London, Chatto Windus 1933, p. 85:

"The crux, as Rhodes would have expressed it, was the French Company. It all depended on who could buy out the French Company. Rhodes did so. He was associated now in this business with the Hamburg Jew, Alfred Beit. ... He was richer even than Rhodes. The path from one Jew to another is an easy one. Rhodes went to England to see Lord Rothschild, and Lord Rothschild approved of him. Within a few days, as Rhodes described it in a subsequent speech, he had three-quarters of a million pounds."

Carroll Quigley reveals in The Anglo-American Establishment, p. 34:

"In each of his seven wills, Rhodes entrusted his bequest to a group of men to carry out his purpose. In the first will, as we have seen, the trustees were Lord Carnarvon and Sidney Shippard. In the second will (1882), the sole trustee was his friend N. E. Pickering. In the third will (1888), Pickering having died, the sole trustee was Lord Rothschild. In the fourth will (1891), W. T. Stead was added, while in the fifth (1892), Rhodes's solicitor, B. F. Hawksley, was added to the previous two. In the sixth (1893) and seventh (1899) wills, the personnel of the trustees shifted considerably, ending up, at Rhodes's death in 1902, with a board of seven trustees: Lord Milner, Lord Rosebery, Lord Grey, Alfred Beit {of Rothschild's faith: see p. 135}, L. L. Michell, B. F. Hawksley, and Dr. Starr Jameson. This is the board to which the world looked to set up the Rhodes Scholarships." quigley.html.

In World War I, the British Empire had to go cap-in-hand to Lord Rothschild, to get the US to join the war. In return, Britain had to guarantee Palestine as a Jewish homeland; this contract was the basis of the creation of the state of Israel.

Robert John, Behind the Balfour Declaration: balfour.html

Strangely, the Balfour Declaration confirmed Rhodes' view of the importance of Anglo-American unity; yet in the end this unity between Anglo-Saxons was only achieved via Jewish middlemen.

Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar; so were two of Australia's recent Prime Ministers, Malcolm Fraser and Bob Hawke. All three are strong Zionists.

Benjamin H. Freedman, an American Jew who converted to Christianity, said in a speech: freedman.html

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war.
{end quote}

Hellenism, Zionism and Marxism of the Trotskyist kind, jostle for domination within the Empire. The banning of "female genital mutilation" is an example of a Trotskyist win over the Hellenists. The inability of the CFR to use the threat of withholding its aid to Israel, as a lever to bring peace in the Middle East, attests to the struggle between the Hellenists and the Zionists.

No comments:

About Me

I am a professional independent trader