The FED and the Rothschild's (part 2)

The FED is not what most people assume it may be its not a government entity and barely a few people can explain how it works. ıts a secretive organisation and the only official part in it is the appointment of the chairman and board of directors by the President. Goldman the superior investmentbank has infiltrated this institution, they have people who usually earn 10 mil. a year sitting on 150k a year jobs - do you think they do that to serve theit country. No Goldman developed a web of informatin infrastructure and that was the case from the beginning the first president for the FED was a Banker from Warburg (Germany) that was an outlet of the Rothschild's as much as Goldman is today. Before we have a brief look into history and how the FED was created Mr Greenspan has a big part in this financial disaster from many angles. He introduced this phony inflation measurement changes and allowed the banks to leverage to this insane degree's and create this spectacular bubble's which had to burst with the support of the Bush administration.

Excerpt from Robert Glover

http://www.stariq.com/Main/Articles/P0008354.HTM

Most Americans are taught that the Revolution began with the battles of Lexington and Concord. Monetary historian Alexander Del Mar says:

Lexington and Concord were trivial acts of resistance which chiefly concerned those who took part in them and which might have been forgiven; but the creation and circulation of bills of credit...were acts of a whole people and coming as they did on the heels of the strenuous efforts made by the Crown to suppress paper money in America they constituted acts of defiance so contemptuous and insulting to the Crown that forgiveness was thereafter impossible...there was but one course for the Crown to pursue and that was to suppress and punish those acts of rebellion...Thus the Bills of Credit of this era, which ignorance and prejudice have attempted to belittle into the mere instruments of a reckless financial policy, were really the standards of the Revolution. They were more than this: they were the Revolution itself.

In its Constitution, the new nation provided for a monetary system that was to be debt-free and controlled by Congress. This was viewed as an outrage by aristocracies around the world at the time, who believed the human race would disintegrate into helpless chaos without the guidance of those “divinely appointed to rule.” The Rothschilds, a banking family from Germany which showed genius in taking over the money systems of European countries around this time, determined to serve the world’s aristocracy by persuading the USA to create a central bank and issue currency as debt owned the wealth elite who owned this banking operation. Cried the London Times:

If that mischievous financial policy which had its origin in the North American Republic should become indurate down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without a debt. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.

Presidents Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln steadfastly resisted attempts to privatize US money by creating a central bank. Lincoln was assassinated and Jackson would have been had his would-be assassin kept his powder dry in the damp Capitol Building of those times. Astrologically, Jackson’s veto of the central bank bill in his day occurred under an opposition of Saturn and Pluto. Lincoln’s introduction of the Greenback occurred with Saturn and Jupiter conjunct in Virgo (putting both conjunct the US Neptune) opposite transiting Neptune, with Pluto in Taurus making no major aspect.

The Rothschilds and their increasingly large number of associates worked diligently through the 1800s to get a central bank established in the USA, for they would then reap a cornucopia of profits into perpetuity by lending money to government, to be repaid by future taxpayers at ever-compounding interest. They finally succeeded when, on December 23, 1913, Congress created the US Federal Reserve System. At this time, Pluto was opposite its conjunction with the Galactic Center, and also—tellingly enough—opposite the Sun.

At this time, the years leading into and through World War I, anyone who suspected foul play by bankers was castigated as a conspiracy nut. President Woodrow Wilson, who’d signed this legislation, joined the nuts 10 years later when he said:

I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial Nation is controlled by a system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the Nation, therefore, and all its activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be the worse ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the world—no longer a Government of free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and vote by the majority, but the government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men.

The old saying is, “Whoever controls the money, controls the nation.” Amselm Rothschild put it this way: "Give me the power to issue a nation's money, then I do not care who makes the law."

I think we have to open up to any possibility and even consider a conspiracy since for the one's who are informed (Bernanke made his first rate cut surprisingly on a Friday before markets opened and Golman boughts unusual big amounts of calls the prior day against the trend - that is not a coincidence since the head of capital markets in the FED is a former Goldman and would habe been informed) or even creating events its easy to make incredible amounts of money even with falling markets. The Rothschild's made big money because they knew how Napoleon's defeat ended before anyone else knew. Thats why they bought Reuters which was at those times the dominant news agency especially for financial news. They own the Economist which has the reputation of being a liberal considerate but elitist magazine but I have to say they use medie to opinionate other people as media's main function has been brought too. Thr Rothschild's were the most powerful financial entity til the 1900 centuryand suddenly they vanished some small entities of boutique investment banks stayed - lets se where they are hiding

Helen Sachs (Grandaughter of Goldman Sachs co-founder Joseph Sachs) married Nathan Straus Jr. (Grandson of Lazarus Straus who headed R.H. Macy & Co.)...

Nathan Straus Jr.'s first cousin (also grandson of Lazarus Straus) Roger William Straus Married Gladys Guggenheim (Grandson of Meyer Guggenheim)...

Meyer Guggenheim's daughter is Cora Guggenheim.

Cora Guggenheim married Louis F. Rothschild...

So you have the Rothschild-Guggenheim-Straus-Sachs connection.

Here is more...

Louis F. Rothschild was partners with Albert Loeb to form Albert Loeb & Co.

Louis F. Rothschild was the son of Frank Rothschild.

The powerful Jewish families of finance are linked together through marriage and Goldman is basically the trading arm of the Rothschild financial structure. They are smart enough to understand that with the 19th century the information distribution made a quantum leap and is on a much higher level which even increased with the Internet. So they had to dilute their presence and distract the public from their influence. When you read the lists of the richest people at Forbes magazine that is one of those distractions. The richest people are even not mentioned there or at far too low numbers. Rockefeller was the richest man on earth after Rothschild's and even if you just invested his money after he died in Bonds he would still be the second richest. Compared to them Buffett has only petty cash with 64 bil. they are easily by the trillions. The one bank which benefits the most by the financial disaster are JP Morgan and Goldman, JP MOrgan got Bear Stearns for free and Washington Mutual assets for a bargain. The prime brokerage which is one of the few lucrative segments in Investment banking has been concentrated now on those two and Morgan Stanley but I doubt that the latter one can survive on its own and has less credit by market participants. The default of Lehman looks obscure to me in many ways first of all Fuld is a shrewed guy why did he go for such pathetic prices to sell stakes with 85 bil toxic assets and why did the FED did not bail them out - does not make sense to me from a straight mind frame but rom an evil one it was the ideal trigger point to let the markets collapse. As I said earlier some people will make big money from this and we are not talking about Hedge Funds they lost in average plenty money during this year.We will dig a bit deeper going forward.